Save
Download PDF

Combining left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy may enable patients with morbid obesity to lose enough weight for heart transplant eligibility. In a retrospective study, we evaluated long-term outcomes of patients with body mass indexes ≥35 who underwent LVAD implantation and longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy during the same hospitalization (from January 2013 through July 2018) and then adhered to a dietary protocol. We included 22 patients (mean age, 49.9 ± 12.5 yr; mean preoperative body mass index, 43.3 ± 6.2). Eighteen months after gastrectomy, all 22 patients were alive, and 16 (73%) achieved a body mass index of less than 35. Myocardial recovery in 2 patients enabled LVAD removal. As of October 2020, 10 patients (45.5%) had undergone heart transplantation, 5 (22.3%) were waitlisted, 5 (22.3%) still had a body mass index ≥35, and 2 (9%) had died.

With LVAD support, longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy, and dietary protocols, most of our patients with morbid obesity and advanced heart failure lost enough weight for transplant eligibility. Support from physicians and dietitians can maximize positive results in these patients.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; body mass index; heart transplantation/physiology/standards; heart-assist devices; nutritional status; obesity, morbid/complications/surgery; patient selection; retrospective studies; treatment outcome; weight loss/physiology

Heart transplantation (HT) has substantially improved outcomes in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). However, not all patients are ideal candidates. Although eligibility requirements vary by center, it is widely accepted that a body mass index (BMI) of 35 or higher contraindicates HT, because obesity is associated with higher risks of postoperative morbidity and death.1,2

In patients with obesity and end-stage HF who are not eligible for HT, a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) can be used as a bridge to transplant (BTT). However, these patients are often unable to lose enough weight because poor cardiac function limits their ability to exercise; many die of HF before they are eligible for HT.3 Therefore, clinicians must consider alternatives, such as bariatric surgery, to improve outcomes. Longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) after LVAD placement46 has shown promise in BTT therapy.

Few articles in the literature beyond case reports411 have focused on LVAD placement and bariatric surgery as combination BTT therapy in patients with HF and morbid obesity. Therefore, we decided to perform a study of our patients to determine how much weight they lost, how many reduced their BMI to below 35, and how many underwent successful BTT.

Patients and Methods

Our retrospective, single-center cohort analysis included 22 patients with a BMI of 35 or higher and end-stage HF (Table I). From January 2013 through July 2018, the patients underwent LVAD placement and LSG during the same hospitalization as BTT therapy. From chart reviews, we collected baseline data on age, sex, height, date of LVAD placement, date of LSG, and body weight before LSG. Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Follow-up data were collected on body weight after LSG, as well as the date of HT listing or LVAD explantation, when applicable. Listing status and deaths were monitored for 18 months, and in one case, through October 2020. Records were given study numbers for privacy, and our local institutional review board waived the need for written informed consent.

TABLE I. Body Mass Index and Percentage of Weight Loss in the 22 Patients Over 18 Months
TABLE I.

Surgical Protocol

Every patient underwent the same prebariatric screening. The LVAD was implanted first, as described previously,6 immediately after which the LSG was performed with use of a standard 4-port technique.

Dietary Protocol

After LSG and while still hospitalized, the patients were introduced to the 4-stage dietary protocol developed at our institution (Table II). The weight-loss diet progresses from clear liquids to solid food and ultimately ends with a low-fat, low-carbohydrate plan. The multidisciplinary HF team encouraged patients to drink 48 to 64 ounces of water daily, to avoid using straws, and to limit alcohol and caffeine intake, as well as to eat small, frequent meals at a slow pace. After discharge from the hospital, the patients had follow-up appointments in our outpatient clinic. Our HF dietitians continued the diet education process, monitored compliance with the protocol, and provided ongoing weight-loss counseling. Depending on specific requests from the patients' physicians, the dietitians continued to monitor weight loss and provide medical nutrition therapy as needed.

TABLE II. Dietary Protocol After Longitudinal Sleeve Gastrectomy
TABLE II.

Data Analysis

Quantitative data are reported as mean ± SD or as median and interquartile range (IQR); qualitative data are reported as number and percentage.

Results

Before LSG, 5 patients (22.7%) were in obesity class 2 (BMI 35 to <40), and 17 (77.3%) were in class 3 (BMI ≥40). Two of the class 3 patients had a BMI of greater than 50.

Fourteen patients (63.6%) achieved a BMI of less than 35 at 12 months, as did 16 patients (72.7%) at 18 months (Fig. 1). Of note, both patients with baseline BMIs greater than 50 reduced their BMIs to below 35.

Fig. 1Fig. 1Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Graphs show A) mean body mass index (BMI) and percentage of weight loss over 18 months, and B) cumulative total of patients who achieved a BMI of less than 35 over 18 months. LSG = longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy; LVAD = left ventricular assist device

Citation: Texas Heart Institute Journal 49, 1; 10.14503/THIJ-20-7521

Two patients experienced myocardial recovery, and their devices were explanted. One, whose LVAD was explanted at 16 months, had lost 58.4% of body weight (BMI, 34.1); the other, explanted at 25 months, had lost 42.3% of body weight (BMI, 29.7).

Weight loss was not the sole factor affecting transplant eligibility in many cases. Each patient's clinical and social status was reviewed to determine access to postoperative care and support, as well as other medical conditions that could affect their clinical outcome. Ultimately, 11 patients (50%) were either listed for HT (n=10) or underwent LVAD removal (n=1) within 18 months (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2Fig. 2Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Graph shows the cumulative number of patients who were listed for heart transplantation or underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) explantation. LSG = longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy

Citation: Texas Heart Institute Journal 49, 1; 10.14503/THIJ-20-7521

All patients were alive at 18 months. Two patients died later. One, waitlisted at 12 months, underwent HT at 17 months and died 7 months later (24 mo after LVAD + LSG). His posttransplant course was complicated by primary graft dysfunction that necessitated venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Subsequent sepsis led to multiorgan failure, and the family decided to withdraw care. The other patient never achieved a BMI of less than 35 and died 40 months after LSG. Toxic metabolic encephalopathy of unknown cause was complicated by sepsis and retroperitoneal bleeding. The poor prognosis led the family to withdraw care.

As of October 2020, 10 patients (45.5%) had undergone HT, 5 (22.3%) were listed for HT, 2 (9%) had undergone LVAD explantation, and 5 still had a BMI ≥35 (Fig. 3). Seventeen of the 22 patients (77.3%) either were listed for HT or underwent successful LVAD removal. Their median time from LSG to listing or explantation was 362 days (IQR, 172–831 d). In the 10 transplanted patients, the median time from LSG to HT was 352 days (IQR, 225–496 d).

Fig. 3Fig. 3Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Flow chart shows outcomes in the 22 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as of October 2020. BMI = body mass index

Citation: Texas Heart Institute Journal 49, 1; 10.14503/THIJ-20-7521

Discussion

Our results show that LVAD support, LSG, and a dietary protocol with ongoing encouragement can enable patients to reduce their BMI. Most in our cohort achieved a BMI of less than 35 at 12 months, and more than half were either listed for HT or had recovered myocardial function at 18 months. Substantial weight loss improved their likelihood of HT and their chances of survival.

Of note, the therapy was not effective in all patients. Six of the 22 did not achieve a BMI of less than 35 in 18 months and, as of October 2020, 5 still struggled to lose weight.

Study Limitations. This retrospective review is limited in its application scope. The small sample size and single-center approach may have introduced bias. The data are accurate; however, conclusions must remain tentative until verification in a larger cohort. Regardless, the number of patients and duration of follow-up add to the relevant literature and can inform future studies. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Conclusion

Our data support LVAD placement and LSG for BTT in patients with morbid obesity and advanced HF. Adherence to a dietary protocol after LSG, with encouragement from physicians and dietitians, further aids long-term weight loss in this vulnerable patient population.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Michelle Sauer and Dr. Jessica Moody for editorial support, and The Center for Advanced Heart Failure Collaborative Group for their clinical efforts and data collection.

Conflict of interest disclosure: The physicians report receiving in-kind support in the form of food and beverages, education, or travel from pharmaceutical companies, device companies, or both; however, none of this support rose to the level of a conflict of interest or was related to this manuscript.

Meeting presentation: Some data were presented at the 65th annual meeting of the ASAIO, San Francisco, 26–29 June 2019.

References

  • 1.

    Lietz K, John R, Burke EA, Ankersmit JH, McCue JD, Naka Y, et al.. Pretransplant cachexia and morbid obesity are predictors of increased mortality after heart transplantation. Transplantation2001;72(

    2
    ):27783.

  • 2.

    Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, Semigran MJ, Uber PA, Baran DA, et al.. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: a 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant2016;35(

    1
    ):123.

  • 3.

    Yanagida R, Czer LSC, Mirocha J, Rafiei M, Esmailian F, Moriguchi J, et al.. Left ventricular assist device in patients with body mass index greater than 30 as bridge to weight loss and heart transplant candidacy. Transplant Proc2014;46(

    10
    ):35759.

  • 4.

    Ahmed M, Le H, Aranda JM Jr, Klodell CT. Elective noncardiac surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Card Surg2012;27(

    5
    ):63942.

  • 5.

    Hawkins RB, Go K, Raymond SL, Ayzengart A, Friedman J. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with heart failure and left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplant. Surg Obes Relat Dis2018;14(

    9
    ):126973.

  • 6.

    Shah SK, Gregoric ID, Nathan SS, Akkanti BH, Kar B, Bajwa KS, LVAD/Sleeve Gastrectomy Collaborative Group. Simultaneous left ventricular assist device placement and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a bridge to transplant for morbidly obese patients with severe heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant2015;34(

    11
    ):148991.

  • 7.

    Caceres M, Czer LSC, Esmailian F, Ramzy D, Moriguchi J. Bariatric surgery in severe obesity and end-stage heart failure with mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to successful heart transplantation: a case report. Transplant Proc2013;45(

    2
    ):7989.

  • 8.

    Chaudhry UI, Kanji A, Sai-Sudhakar CB, Higgins RS, Needleman BJ. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients with end-stage heart failure and left ventricular assist device: medium-term results. Surg Obes Relat Dis2015;11(

    1
    ):8893.

  • 9.

    Greene J, Tran T, Shope T. Sleeve gastrectomy and left ventricular assist device for heart transplant. JSLS2017;21(

    3
    ):e2017.00049.

  • 10.

    Lockard KL, Allen C, Lohmann D, Severyn DA, Schaub RD, Kauffman KE, et al.. Bariatric surgery for a patient with a HeartMate II ventricular assist device for destination therapy. Prog Transplant2013;23(

    1
    ):2832.

  • 11.

    Wikiel KJ, McCloskey CA, Ramanathan RC. Bariatric surgery: a safe and effective conduit to cardiac transplantation. Surg Obes Relat Dis2014;10(

    3
    ):47984.

  • Download PDF
Copyright: © 2022 by the Texas Heart® Institute, Houston
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Graphs show A) mean body mass index (BMI) and percentage of weight loss over 18 months, and B) cumulative total of patients who achieved a BMI of less than 35 over 18 months.

LSG = longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy; LVAD = left ventricular assist device


Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Graph shows the cumulative number of patients who were listed for heart transplantation or underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) explantation.

LSG = longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy


Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Flow chart shows outcomes in the 22 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as of October 2020.

BMI = body mass index


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Igor D. Gregoric, MD, Center for Advanced Heart Failure, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin St., Suite 2350, Houston, TX 77030 E-mail:Igor.D.Gregoric@uth.tmc.edu